Hypnosis: Is it valid in UFO abduction cases?
An Examination of the Use of Hypnosis to Fill in Partial Memories of UFO Abduction
TThe widely held consensus among academic psychologists, as well as memory researchers in the field, is that hypnosis is not a reliable method for accurately recovering forgotten memories. While it is true that hypnosis may enhance an individual's confidence in their recollections and subjective experiences, it does not consistently lead to an improvement in the truthfulness or accuracy of those memories. In fact, the nature of hypnotic suggestion can sometimes lead to the fabrication of false memories. However, it is important to note that many psychotherapists strongly insist that this realization does not mean that hypnosis should be dismissed entirely as a therapeutic tool. They believe that when used appropriately, hypnosis can still be beneficial for certain clients, particularly in addressing anxiety, phobias, and various forms of psychological distress.
Academic research has extensively demonstrated that, although hypnosis can significantly improve the recollection of accurate information, it can also inadvertently stimulate the formation of details that were never part of the individual's actual experience. This phenomenon is particularly true when the hypnotist prompts the client to supply specifics that are not readily available in their conscious memory. Critics in the field contend that the potential inaccuracies associated with hypnosis justify a complete dismissal of its use in therapeutic settings, arguing that the risk of introducing false memories poses serious ethical concerns. On the other hand, proponents advocate for the considerable therapeutic benefits of hypnosis, particularly in expediting both physical and emotional healing processes. They highlight how hypnosis can facilitate relaxation and help manage pain, anxiety, and other conditions. However, what remains ambiguous and still requires further investigation is its effectiveness in addressing various types of amnesia, as researchers continue to explore the complex relationship between hypnotic suggestion and memory retrieval.
Some individuals naturally have a significantly higher susceptibility to forming false memories as compared to others, which can vary greatly from person to person. This particular factor is crucial when hypnosis is utilized for those individuals who are thought to have undergone a UFO abduction experience, as it can influence the validity of the memories that emerge under hypnosis. Nevertheless, skilled practitioners of hypnosis possess the ability to employ specific suggestions strategically to assess a hypnotized person's inclination toward generating false memories. Interestingly, the majority do not fall victim to suggestive prompts presented during the hypnosis session; in fact, they frequently counter these prompts with their own observations and recollections, illustrating the complexities of human memory retrieval and the interplay between suggestion and genuine experience.
Many clinical hypnotherapists nevertheless maintain that hypnosis can be useful for:
Promoting deep relaxation and enhancing overall concentration.
Assisting clients in navigating their personal experiences and emotions.
Retrieving memories that are present but hard to access.
Alleviating anxiety and addressing issues like chronic pain, phobias, or compulsive behaviors.
Responsible hypnotherapists generally emphasize several safeguards:
Refrain from using leading or suggestive inquiries.
Do not take for granted that memories recalled under hypnosis are accurate.
Whenever feasible, verify significant memories with corroborating evidence from independent sources.
Differentiate clearly between therapeutic exploration and forensic examination.
In the intriguing and often controversial realm of UFO encounters and alleged abduction investigations, opinions are significantly divided and polarized. Researchers, skeptics, and believers alike maintain strong and differing perspectives on the validity of such events. Among these figures is Benjamin Simon, MD, a distinguished neuropsychiatrist recognized for his extensive experience in the field. Dr. Simon undertook hypnosis sessions with Betty and Barney Hill, a couple whose story has become one of the most notable cases in UFO history. He regarded hypnosis principally as a therapeutic method designed to help alleviate the anxiety stemming from their extraordinary close encounter with a silent, hovering unidentified aerial vehicle, which left them both deeply affected. During the course of his treatment, Dr. Simon worked with the Hills separately and implemented a technique of reinstating amnesia at the conclusion of each hypnosis session. This approach was meant to ensure that they would not carry the distressing memories of their experience into their everyday lives. Despite this, the couple consistently recalled specific details that extended beyond the realm of Betty's dreams, as their narratives remarkably aligned in numerous key aspects. It is also worth noting that Dr. Simon held a preconceived bias against the authenticity of non-human abductions; thus, he introduced suggestions during the hypnosis sessions that aimed to steer the Hills away from the notion that they had been abducted by extraterrestrial beings. Nevertheless, despite his guiding efforts, they found themselves unable to dismiss the vivid and persistent memory of their close encounter. This included Barney's conscious sighting of non-human entities, two distinct sets of codelike buzzing sounds that they both reported hearing, a thirty-five-mile gap in their journey for which there was no prosaic explanation, and the alarming two-hour loss of consciousness they could not explain, alongside the physical evidence they later discovered.
Many subsequent UFO researchers have utilized hypnosis in several instances involving missing time, often associated with UFO sightings. This method has garnered significant interest due to its capacity to reveal concealed memories or events that individuals might not be consciously aware of. However, critics contend that suggestive interviewing methods might unintentionally shape or bolster the narratives being recalled by the subjects. As a result of these concerns, many modern-day scholars—including those who hold the view that certain experiencers recount authentic anomalous occurrences—advocate that hypnotically retrieved memories should always be viewed as a singular source of information rather than definitive proof of actual events. They emphasize the crucial importance of assessing these memories alongside contemporaneous documentation, eyewitness accounts, physical evidence, and additional supporting data to form a more comprehensive understanding of the experiences in question.
References
Alladin, A.. Cognitive hypnotherapy: A new vision and strategy for research and practice.
American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, (2012) 54(4), 249–262.
Barnier, Amanda J., Rochelle E. Cox, and Greg Savage. “Hypnosis, Memory and the Brain,”
Scientific American, October 7, 2008. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/hypnosis-memory-brain/
Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. 1987, 35(4), pp. 215-230.
Gibson, H.B. Hypnosis: Its Nature and Therapeutic Uses. New York, NY: Tap linger Publishing
Company, 1977.
Hilgard, Ernest R. “Research Advances in Hypnosis.” International Journal of Clinical and
Experimental Hypnosis. 1987, 25(4), pp 248-264.
Lai bow, Rima E., M.D. “Clinical Discrepancies between Expected and Observed Data in
Patients Reporting UFO Abductions: Implications for Treatment.” 1993.
Lawson, Alvin. “What can we Learn from Hypnosis of Imaginary Abductees?” MUFON 1977
International Symposium Proceedings. Seguin, Texas: MUFON, Inc., 1977, pp. 107-135.
Elizabeth Loftus, “Creating False Memories,” Scientific American, Volume 277, number 3,
September 1997, pp. 70-75.
Mendelsohn, Avi, et al. “Mesmerizing Memories: Brain Substrates of Episodic Memory
Suppression in
Posthypnotic Amnesia.” Neuron.
170.
Sidis, M.A. Psychology of Suggestion. New York, NY” D. Appleton and CO., 1903.
Simon, Benjamin. “Hypnosis in the Treatment of Military Neuroses,” Psychiatric Opinion, (Vol.
4: No. 5) October 1967, pp. 27-28.
Sutton, Jeremy, PhD. “Does Hypnotherapy Really Work? 10+ Scientific Findings.” Positive
Psychology. March 29, 2023. https://positivepsychology.com/hypnotherapy/
Zoli, Mary-Beth, M. Ed, LMHC. “EMDR Hypnosis? EMDR vs. Hypnosis, What are the
Differences?” EMDR Healing. July
18, 2022.